Gearing system having interdigited teeth with convex and concave surface portions

ABSTRACT

A gearing system includes a pair of gear support plates arranged to rotate about parallel but offset axes with the plates extending parallel to each other in parallel radially extending plates. Each plate includes axially extending teeth in the form of sections of lune shaped elements having concave and convex opposed surfaces. The teeth are interdigited axially such that various pairs of interdigited teeth will be in cooperating surface contact. Rotation of each support plate about its own axis causes the teeth to orbit relative to each other and engage in a driving relationship in a smooth manner, with the convex portion of certain teeth engaging smoothly with the concave portion of adjacent teeth. The gearing system provides a 1:1 speed ratio and has application as an Oldham coupling or synchronizer for a scroll fluid device.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a gearing system for use in rotary gear drive arrangements wherein one gear (i.e. a drive gear) moves in an orbiting fashion relative to another gear (a driven gear). The invention has application as a synchronizer in, for example, scroll fluid devices.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Gear drive systems, known in the art, having two gears that rotate in mesh but where one of the gears orbits about the other gear are generally associated with planetary gear arrangements. In planetary gear arrangements, the gears are located in a common plane. Spur or helical gears are generally used in such systems. The teeth of such gears have meshing surfaces which are most commonly portions of involute or cycloidal curves. These curves are commonly truncated by an inner and an outer radius, thus forming the teeth of the gear.

Also known in the art are scroll fluid devices. The generic term "scroll fluid devices" is applied to an arrangement of meshed, involute spiral wraps that are moved along circular translation paths in orbiting fashion relative to each other. This orbiting motion produces one or more fluid transporting or working chambers that move radially between inlet and outlet zones of the device. Such scroll devices may function as pumps, compressors, motors or expanders, depending upon their configuration, the drive system utilized and the nature of energy transferred between the scroll wraps and the fluid moving through the device.

Typically, a pair of scroll wraps will be coupled by an Oldham coupling in order to prevent relative rotational motion between the wraps. Oldham couplings have been used in the prior art between a pair of scrolls to permit one scroll to orbit in a circular path relative to the other scroll. A typical example of a scroll fluid device utilizing an Oldham coupling is illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 4,178,143 to Thelen et al. In this example, a conventional Oldham coupling maintains a pair of co-rotating scrolls in fixed rotational relationship while permitting their relative orbital movement with respect to each other. In this sense, the Oldham coupling can be viewed as a one-to-one gear drive arrangement that accommodates relative orbital movement between the scroll wraps.

Synchronization of one scroll with respect to the other must be maintained in all scroll machines. If synchronism is lost, gas sealing is ruined and the machine can jam mechanically. In many scroll machines, a steady torque load exists between one scroll and its mate. An Oldham coupling can carry this torque load while preserving synchronization of one scroll with respect to the other. In scroll machines which by their design do not have a steady torque load, there are nonetheless residual stray torques such as from varying friction or gas loads that tends to upset the synchronization of one scroll with respect to the other. An Oldham coupling can be used to carry this stray torque load.

In co-rotating, as well as orbital scroll fluid devices in the prior art, a problem is encountered in using an Oldham coupling. An Oldham coupling consists of three parts: one part on each scroll, and a moving intermediate part that slides linearly with respect to each scroll. The necessary motion of this intermediate or loose part, creates inertia forces that are difficult to balance in either orbiting or spinning scroll machines. If it is balanced, inertia forces will nonetheless have to be carried through its sliding bearing surfaces. If it is not balanced, vibration that results from inertia forces can be reduced by minimizing its mass. But to reduce the mass of the loose part is at the expense of mechanical strength and wear life at the sliding bearing surfaces The overall performance of a scroll machine increases with increasing rotational speed. At high rotational speeds, it is essential to keep the synchronizer as simple as possible in order minimize the number of available vibrational modes. But an Oldham coupling will always limit the rotational speed of a scroll machine because the mass of the loose part cannot be reduced farther than its strength and wear life will permit.

Other synchronizers known in the art also have speed limitations. Other known synchronizers include the use of a necklace of balls, timing belts and flexgear synchronizers. All of these known synchronizers also include loose parts in addition to the two scrolls. The loose parts of these prior synchronizers move in trajectories that are different from either scroll.

The dynamic behaviour of these loose parts at high rotational speed can result in large unsteady inertia forces that cause overall vibration and noise. The loose parts can also have unwanted resonances that magnify the inertia forces to destructive levels. The number of available vibrational modes is large. The occasional and unpredictable instability and rough running of these prior synchronizers can cause a shortened and noisy life. This is especially true in unlubricated scroll machines.

Scrolls can also be synchronized by the action of pins on one scroll plate that orbit within corresponding holes in the other scroll plate. In this type of synchronizer, a third or loose part is not required. But in such synchronizers, the pressure at the contact areas, due to a torque load between the scrolls, is generally so high that only a short life can be achieved.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a unique gear drive system which permits two gear units (driver and driven) to be directly interengaged and which permits relative orbital movement between the gears. The present invention further provides a unique interengaging gear teeth configuration wherein torque loads from the drive gear to the driven gear are smoothly passed from one tooth to the next. In order to accomplish this function, each intermeshing tooth includes both a concave and a convex side surface. During relative orbital motion, various teeth between the gear units will be interengaged such that the concave side of a tooth on one gear will contact the convex surface side of a tooth on the other gear. Due to the cooperating shapes between the gear teeth, large surface area contacts will be made between the teeth and smooth transitions between engaged teeth pairs can be accomplished.

When utilized with scroll fluid devices, the present invention provides a unique synchronizer whereby the conventional Oldham coupling is replaced by axially interdigitated gear teeth affixed to the supporting end plates of each scroll wrap. Therefore, the gear system of this invention provides synchronization without loose parts and enables operation of scroll machines at higher rotational speeds than would be possible with other synchronizers.

A synchronizer coupling in accordance with the present invention accommodates the orbital movement of a scroll wrap relative to another wrap without the need for utilizing a conventional slide ring-type synchronizer, such as is typically used in the prior art. The number of interdigitated teeth may be varied depending upon the diameter of the scroll plates and the desired thickness of each tooth. Furthermore, the contact pressure due to torque loads between the scrolls can be minimized by increasing the contact radii between the contacting gear teeth.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a sectional view taken essentially longitudinally through a co-rotating scroll fluid device embodying the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a cross sectional view taken along line 2--2 of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 represents a schematic, top view diagram of one of the gear units.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

With reference to the accompanying drawings, the gearing system of the present invention will be described with reference to a preferred embodiment wherein the gearing system is utilized in a scroll fluid devicegenerally indicated at 1. The scroll fluid device 1 includes a pair of meshed involute spiral wraps 7, 12. In particular, spiral wrap 7 is eitherformed integral with or securely attached to inner surface portion 6 of a first wrap support plate 5, herein termed first gear plate 5. Spiral wrap 12, in turn, is either integrally formed with or fixedly secured to inner surface portion 11 of second wrap support plate 10, herein termed second gear plate 10.

First gear plate 5 includes a first shaft 16 which is adapted to be driven by motor 18 in order to rotate the first gear plate 5. First shaft 16 and gear plate 5 rotate about axis 9. Gear plate 5 is supported for rotation about axis 9 by means of bearings 17a held by bearing support 17. Likewise, a second shaft 21 is rotatably supported by bearings 22a held bybearing support 22 and is fixedly secured to second gear plate 10. It should be noted that bearings 17a and 22a snug close to their respective gear plates 5, 10 since radial loads originate in these areas. Both gear plates are mounted for co-rotation. As will be explained more fully below,the synchronizer arrangement in accordance with this invention transmits torque from one gear plate to another at an exact 1:1 speed ratio.

Since the synchronizer arrangement effectively transmits torque between thegear plates and permits co-rotation, second shaft 21 may or may not be driven by a separate motor. As illustrated in FIG. 1, second shaft 21 is adapted to be driven by motor 23. Shaft 21 and gear plate 10 rotate about axis 14. Axis 14 is offset from axis 9 by a distance corresponding to the radius R_(or) of the orbit circle of the scroll device as clearly indicated in FIGS. 2 and 3. The bearing supports 17 and 22 may assume any appropriate form suitable for the operating conditions of the scroll fluiddevice. For example, bearing support 22 may be arranged so that its respective gear plate 10 may be moveable relative to gear plate 5 in a direction generally along a line connecting the axes 9 and 14 (not shown) so that one gear plate can approach the other to effectively open the working chamber between the scroll wraps to provide a loading of the wrapsas is known in the art.

Defined between first scroll wrap 7 and second scroll wrap 12 are fluid chambers 15. Typically, the scroll fluid device would operate at high speed within a gaseous fluid medium surrounding the rotating scroll wraps so that, when the device is operated as compressor, fluid intake occurs atthe outer end of each scroll wrap This fluid arrives at the outer end of the scroll wraps by flowing through openings between the synchronizer gearteeth (not labeled). When functioning as a compressor, output flow through the device occurs at output port 34. Of course, it should be understood that the scroll fluid device 1 can operate as an expander by admitting pressurized fluid at port 34 and causing it to expand within the radially outwardly moving fluid chambers 15, to be discharged at the outer ends of the scroll wraps, from whence it flows through open portions between the synchronizer teeth to the environment. However, for purposes of the remainder of this description, it will be assumed that the scroll fluid device 1 illustrated is arranged to function as a compressor.

The synchronizer arrangement in accordance with this invention comprises anannular array of axially extending, equally circumferentially spaced teeth 40, 45 affixed to and extending perpendicular from the outer circumferential portion of inner surface 6 and 11 of gear plate 5 and 10 respectively. Each of the gear teeth 40, 45 have a similar shape as will now be described with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3.

The gear assembly of the present invention is designed to transmit torques in either sense at an exact 1:1 speed ratio. To accommodate the orbiting motion, spin axis 14 of second gear plate 10 is parallel to but offset from spin axis 9 of gear plate 5 by a distance corresponding to the orbit radius of the scroll device. The gearing system makes use of the fact thata point moving in a circle will trace a circle on a disc that spins at the same speed about a parallel but offset axis. The orbit circle traced out in this way has a radius equal to the orbit radius or offset distance R_(or) between the parallel spin axes 9, 14.

Each gear plate 5, 10 has associated therewith a pitch circle R_(p) upon which the respective teeth 40, 45 are located. Utilizing N to equal the number of teeth on a given gear plate, the angle α shown in FIG. 3 is equal to 180/N. Since each tooth is substantially identical to any other tooth, the distance between corresponding points on successive teethabout the pitch circle equals an arc distance corresponding to 2 α.

Each tooth 40, 45 has a concave surface 43 of large radius R_(L) and a convex surface 42 of smaller radius R_(s). Therefore, the shape of each tooth 40, 45 may be fully defined by large radius R_(L) and small radiusR_(s) and the maximum tooth thickness (t). Smaller radius R_(s) is measured from a point along the pitch circle a distance corresponding to angle α from the point from which large radius R_(L) is measured. Both radii R_(s) and R_(L) are centered on the pitch circle having a radius R_(p). The convex and concave surfaces of two adjacent teeth on the gear plate 5 and gear plate 10 will mesh when the radius of the concave surface 43 equals the radius of the convex surface 42 plus the radius of the orbit circle. Therefore, after determining the angle α. based on the desired number of teeth on a given gear plate, the desired pitch radius R_(p) and the desired orbit circle radius R_(or),the large radius R_(L) and the smaller radius R_(s) of each tooth 40, 45 may be calculated with respect to one another since: R_(L) -R_(s) =R_(or). Furthermore, geometrically, the maximum thickness (t) of each tooth 40, 45 equals:

    t=2 R.sub.p Sin(α/2)-R.sub.or.

Where:

R_(p) =pitch radius

R_(or) =orbit circle radius

α=180/N

N=number of teeth

When the two gear plates 5, 10, having equal pitch radii and teeth spacing,are designed as discussed above and mounted about parallel but offset rotational axes, the interengaged teeth 40, 45 between gear plate 5 and gear plate 10 will smoothly mesh and effectively transmit torque therebetween. The concave and convex surface radii of each tooth 40, 45 are made as large as feasible to minimize rubbing pressure and Hertz contact stresses between any given pair of engaged teeth.

It should be noted that each tooth 40, 45 takes the form of a truncated lune 49. The teeth are truncated in order to remove the sharp cusp portions that would not effectively carry torque loads in some cases. But with increasing truncation, the radial extent of the teeth decreases and so does the angle over which a given tooth may run in contact. Therefore truncation is designed to be moderate in order to ensure smooth transfer of contact force from one tooth to the next. However, in the spirit of theinvention, each of the teeth need not be truncated but may take a lune shape as shown at 49 in FIG. 3. The outer radius R_(o) of each gear mustbe significantly larger than the inner radius R_(i). That is, the ratio R_(o) /R_(i) will generally be within the range of 1.1 to 1.5, and preferably be about 1.3 as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2. This ratio (R_(o) /R_(i)) affects the number of teeth in mesh, contact pressure, wear rate, and other measures of gear performance.

When the gear arrangement is used in a scroll fluid device, the overall housing size, nature of the cooling, and other secondary features will tend to limit the maximum diameter of each gear. The number of gear teeth is freely variable within reasonable limits. To increase the number of gear teeth to improve the performance of the gear will result in a reduction in tooth thickness. Therefore, the number of teeth has an upper limit set by secondary effects such tooth response to torque and centrifugal loads along with the resonance of each tooth in bending and torsion.

Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, co-rotation of the scroll wraps 7, 12 by motors18, 23 will cause pumping of fluid trapped in chambers 15 between the peripheral regions of the wraps towards the output port 34. During rotation, each pair of interdigitated teeth 40, 45 will sequentially be engaged to maintain the wraps in their desired rotational relationship. During operation, the contact of at least one pair of teeth is always available to carry torque loads. A torque load between scrolls generally causes various contact pressures at several tooth contacts. During rotation, the contact pressure at one tooth surface will repeat cyclicallyonce per turn. A corresponding surface of a neighboring tooth will experience the same cycle of contact pressure, but shifted by a phase angle equal to the angle 2αbetween the teeth. During rotation tooth contact pressure is smoothly passed from teeth that are leaving mesh, and forward to those teeth that are entering into mesh.

It will be understood that although the invention was described with reference to use in scroll pump device, it is to be understood that the description was for illustrative purpose only and it is not intended that the invention be limited to the configuration of the described embodiment.Rather, the unique gearing system may be used in any environment wherein two gear plates require relative orbital movement therebetween. Therefore,it is intended that the invention be limited only by the scope of the following claims. 

I claim:
 1. A gearing system for use in relative orbiting gear drive systems comprising:a first gear plate which is rotatable about a first axis, said first gear plate including a plurality of axially extending teeth located on and circumferentially equally spaced about a first pitch circle; a second gear plate which is rotatable about a second axis, parallel to and laterally spaced by a distance substantially equal to an orbit radius R_(or) from said first axis, said second gear plate including a plurality of axially extending teeth located on and circumferentially equally spaced about a second pitch circle; said plurality of teeth on said first plate being arranged to be interdigited with the plurality of teeth on said second plate such that relative angular displacement of one gear plate relative to the other gear plate is prevented while an orbital movement of one gear plate relative to the other gear plate is accommodated; each tooth on said first and second gear plates including an axially extending convex surface portion and an opposed axially extending concave surface portion such that any one pair of interdigitated teeth have a surface mesh with the convex surface portion of one tooth conforming to and engaging with the concave surface portion of the other tooth.
 2. A gearing system as claimed in claim 1 wherein all the teeth are substantially identical and take the form of at least a section of a lune element, each tooth having a concave surface radius R_(L) measured from a respective first point on its respective pitch circle and a convex surface radius R_(s) measured from a second point located on its pitch circle a predetermined distance from said first point, said predetermined distance being calculated based on the selected number of teeth on each gear plate and the radius of the pitch circle.
 3. A gearing system as claimed in claim 2 wherein the maximum thickness of each tooth equals:

    t=2 R .sub.p Sin (α/2)-R.sub.or

where: t=maximum tooth thickness R_(p) =pitch circle radius α=180/N N=the number of teeth R_(or) =radius of the orbit circle.
 4. A gearing system as claimed in claim 3 wherein all the teeth take the form of a truncated lune element.
 5. A scroll fluid device comprising:at least one pair of meshed axially extending involute spiral wrap having involute centers and defining at least one chamber between them that moves radially between an inlet zone and an outlet zone when one wrap is orbited along a circular path about an orbit center relative to the other wrap; wrap support means secured to and supporting each wrap; means for mounting said wrap support means for enabling relative orbital motion of the wraps relative to each other about an orbit radius; synchronizer means arranged to prevent relative rotation of one wrap relative to the other notwithstanding the orbital motion of one wrap relative to the other, said synchronizer means comprising circumferentially equally spaced, axially extending teeth affixed to each of said wrap support means along respective pitch circles with the teeth of one of said wraps being interdigited with the teeth on the other of said wraps; each of said teeth including an axially extending convex surface portion and an opposed axially extending concave surface portion such that any one pair of interdigitated teeth have a surface mesh with the convex surface portion of one tooth of the pair conforming to and engaging with the concave surface portion of the other tooth of the pair.
 6. A scroll fluid device as claimed in claim 5 wherein all the teeth are substantially identical and take the form of at least a section of a lune element having a concave surface radius R_(L) and a convex surface radius R_(s).
 7. A scroll fluid device as claimed in claim 6 wherein the concave surface radius R_(L) of each tooth is measured from a respective first point on its respective pitch circle and a convex surface radius R_(s) measured from a second point located on its pitch circle a predetermined distance from said first point, said predetermined distance being calculated based on the selected number of teeth on each gear plate and the radius of the pitch circle.
 8. A scroll fluid device as claimed in claim 7 wherein the maximum thickness of each tooth equals:

    t=2 R.sub.p Sin (α/2)-R.sub.or

where: t=maximum tooth thickness R_(p) =pitch circle radius α=180/N N=the number of equally spaced teeth R_(or) =radius of the orbit circle.
 9. A scroll fluid device as claimed in claim 8 wherein all the teeth take the form of a truncated lune element. 